In re: Condemnation by Newtown Twp. Delaware County ~ Appeal of: D. Rafferty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, when the suspect’s probation officer questioned him at the probation office, the suspect “was neither in custody nor were the circumstances sufficiently coercive to require Miranda warnings”
• noting that, when the suspect’s probation officer questioned him at the probation office, the suspect “was neither in custody nor were the circumstances sufficiently coercive to require Miranda warnings”
• noting that, when the suspect’s probation officer questioned him at the probation office, the suspect “was neither in custody nor were the circumstances sufficiently coercive to require Miranda warnings”
• explaining that, “under Oregon law [in Saechao], ‘an invocation of the privilege does not constitute compliance with Oregon’s probation conditions’ requiring probationers to ‘promptly and truthfully answer all reasonable inquiries’” (quoting Saechao, 418 F.3d at 1079)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).