D. Massachusetts· 11/22/1994
In Re Computervision Corp. Securities Litigation
Citations
- 869 F. Supp. 56
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17143
- 1994 WL 683016
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that court could consider prospectus, attached to defendant’s motion to dismiss, without converting it to a motion summary judgment
- “[D]espite Plaintiffs’ careful attempt to avoid use of the term ‘fraud,’ the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint nonetheless clearly sounds in fraud.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Glassman v. Computervision Corp.First Circuit· 1996-07-31· cited 495×
- Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-06-10· cited 208×
- Christensen v. Kingston School CommitteeD. Massachusetts· 2005-03-08· cited 44×
- In re Relafen Antitrust LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2005-09-28· cited 37×
- In Re Number Nine Visual Technology Corp. Securities LitigationD. Massachusetts· 1999-06-01· cited 28×
- Wilensky v. Digital Equipment Corp.D. Massachusetts· 1995-08-08· cited 9×
- Rhodes v. Omega Research, Inc.S.D. Florida· 1999-03-01· cited 8×
- Declude, Inc. v. PerryD. Massachusetts· 2008-12-22· cited 6×
- In re Websecure, Inc. Securities LitigationD. Massachusetts· 1998-09-24· cited 6×
- In re Computervision Corp. Securities LitigationD. Massachusetts· 1996-02-12· cited 1×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,447×
- In Re Time Warner Inc. Securities LitigationSecond Circuit· 1993-11-30· cited 541×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1993-10-14· cited 375×
- New England Data Services, Inc. v. Barry BecherFirst Circuit· 1987-09-28· cited 273×
- Robert G. Hayduk v. Vincent T. LannaFirst Circuit· 1985-10-23· cited 252×
- Richard Romani v. Shearson Lehman HuttonFirst Circuit· 1991-04-08· cited 229×
- Leslie Fudge v. Penthouse International, Ltd., Leslie Fudge v. Penthouse International, Ltd.First Circuit· 1988-03-01· cited 179×
- Ross v. ZVI Trading Corp. Employees' Money Purchase Pension Plan & TrustSupreme Court· 1994-04-04· cited 123×
- Kama Corp. v. Local No. 1451, U. A. W., International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement WorkersSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 103×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,916 Howard Polin, Etc. v. Conductron CorporationEighth Circuit· 1977-04-14· cited 83×
- Darryl Williams v. The City of BostonFirst Circuit· 1986-02-25· cited 64×
- Haft v. Eastland Financial Corp.D. Rhode Island· 1991-01-18· cited 43×
- In re Westinghouse Securities LitigationW.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-07-27· cited 27×
- Loan v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.D. Massachusetts· 1989-08-08· cited 24×
- In Re Elscint, Ltd. Securities LitigationD. Massachusetts· 1987-06-19· cited 22×
- Berliner v. Lotus Development Corp.D. Massachusetts· 1992-02-05· cited 20×
- Gollomp v. TrumpSupreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 19×
- Miller v. New America High Income FundD. Massachusetts· 1991-01-09· cited 18×
- Lucia v. Prospect Street High Income Portfolio, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1991-07-02· cited 11×
Other cases named In Re Computervision Corp. Securities Litigation
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.