In Re Complaint of Consumers Energy Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Moreover, the evidence shows that the Meijer property is an existing customer as that term is defined in [Rule 411],” and there was no “right to change to a new utility because the property had always been an existing customer of Consumers.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).