Skip to main content
· 12/12/1991

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hedrick

Citations

  • 822 P.2d 1187
  • 312 Or. 442
  • 1991 Ore. LEXIS 84

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failure to disclose existence of second will in probate petition constituted nondisclosure of material fact
  • failure to disclose existence of second will in probate petition constituted nondisclosure of material fact
  • violation of DR 1-102(A)(3) when accused failed to disclose that the will he offered for probate had been revoked by a subsequent will
  • lawyer may not escape responsibility for communicating with represented party even if no harm was caused
  • rule violated when lawyer sent demand letter directly to represented person, with copy to lawyer
  • a knowing misrepresentation in a probate petition was a knowingly false statement of law or fact in violation of DR 7-102(A)(5) as well as conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation in violation of DR 1-102(A)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.