In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Geurts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• 30 day suspension for neglect, and noting “potentially disastrous consequences of procrastination or inattention for the parties concerned.”
• lawyer’s opinion that client’s case lacked merit did not excuse neglect, at least to extent of so informing client
• noncooperation with discipline review board, by itself, not grounds for ethical violation as rules of professional discipline don’t give fair notice of the terms and limits of that obligation
• lawyer’s opinion that client’s case lacked merit did not excuse neglect, at least to extent of so informing client
• 30 day suspension for neglect, and noting ‘potentially disastrous consequences of procrastination or inattention for the parties concerned.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).