In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Eads

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting lawyer’s argument that, due to his chemical dependency, he did not have the cognitive capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his acts, and finding that the lawyer knew what he was doing when he used client money for his own purposes
• DR 1-102(A)(3) [2] “contain[s] as an element the culpable commission of certain acts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).