In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Boardman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• imposing public reprimand for misrepresenting to third party that accused’s client was personal representative of estate
• knowing mental state, potential injury, no aggravating factors, mitigating factors of lack of prior disciplinary record and lack of selfish motive
• failure to correct false impression created by unintentional misstatement of material fact constitutes misrepresentation
• failure to correct false impression created by unintentional misstatement of material fact constitutes misrepresentation
• in discussing misrepresentation charge, court stated that “the fact that the accused did not intend injury to any party [does not] preclude the finding of a disciplinary rule violation”
• failure to correct false impression made by unintentional misstatement also is misrepresentation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).