Skip to main content
· 11/27/1998

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Murdock

Citations

  • 968 P.2d 1270
  • 328 Or. 18
  • 1998 Ore. LEXIS 1019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering, but rejecting, a claim of interim mitigation for steps taken after the misconduct at issue
  • considering only the appropriate sanction when an accused stipulated to the charged violations
  • in order to be given weight as mitigating factor, mental disability at least must be “substantial contributing cause of the offense”
  • disbarment appropriate when law firm associate knowingly embezzled more than $9,000 from law firm
  • so stating with regard to former version of rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Durham, Kulongoski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.