In Re Commitment of Rodgers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not err in allowing testimony regarding the use of RRASOR, VRAG, MnSOST-R, and PCL-R
• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing the admission of hearsay evidence regarding the defendant's prior bad acts and criminal offenses and thereby allowing the State's expert to rely on the evidence to form his opinion
• stating that Lee \rejected a Frye challenge\ to the use of actuarial tests and therefore \compelled\ court to conclude that trial court's permitting testimony regarding the same tests was not error
• certifying the same question as in Lee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).