Skip to main content
· 3/11/2011

In Re Commitment of Hill

Citations

  • 334 S.W.3d 226
  • 54 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 669
  • 2011 Tex. LEXIS 191
  • 2011 WL 836933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A party preserves error by a timely request that makes clear—by words or context—the grounds for the request and by obtaining a ruling on that request, whether express or implicit.”
  • “a party can preserve error by asking a specific and proper question, stating the basis on which it sought to ask that question, and obtaining an adverse ruling from the trial court”
  • questions on bias toward homosexuals proper and should have been allowed
  • questions on bias toward homosexuals proper and should have been allowed
  • court abused discretion by rejecting voir dire questions
  • reversing and remanding for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.