Skip to main content
D. Maryland· 8/31/1989

In Re Cole

Citations

  • 104 B.R. 736
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1534

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that utility company may not set off prepetition utility claim against utility deposit the debtor claimed as exempt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: E. Stephen Derby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.