In Re Cole

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under Bankruptcy Rule 4003(c), objecting party has the burden of proving that exemptions are not proper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• FNFS, Ltd. v. Harwood (In Re Harwood)
  E.D. Texas· 2009-04-28· cited 28×
• Farstveet v. Rudolph
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-07-10· cited 26×
• PaineWebber, Inc. v. Murray
  E.D. Texas· 2001-03-30· cited 21×
• Siller v. LPP Mortgage, Ltd
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2008-07-15· cited 13×
• South Bend Community School Corp. v. Eggleston
  N.D. Indiana· 1997-11-21· cited 10×
• In Re Harrington
  E.D. Texas· 2003-12-29· cited 10×
• Farstveet v. Rudolph
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-10-26· cited 2×
• In Re Harwood
  E.D. Texas· 2009-01-30