In re Coger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here is no independent right of access by non-parties to materials produced in discovery and not made part of the public record.”
• proponents of dissemination must indicate which documents they wish to disseminate, at which point burden is on opponents of dissemination to show good cause for existence of protective order
• “The same factors that support access to judicial records and other public documents ... simply are not implicated where the materials were obtained by a party through discovery but have not been filed with the court”
• “Neither plaintiffs nor defendants have appealed from the special master’s protective order, and the court concludes that CBS does not have standing to assert the parties’ rights where they have not chosen to assert them at this time”
• Pratt, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).