Skip to main content
· 2/7/2007

In Re Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 510 F. Supp. 2d 1187
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9113
  • 2007 WL 472943

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing complaint’s failure to identify customers who accepted excess product and to allege facts indicating that customers received unneeded product
  • \[T]he Plaintiffs have failed to plead facts sufficient to demonstrate that the Defendants engaged in channel stuffing.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thrash

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.