In Re Cobb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that status hearing does not violate the stay because it does not move the case forward toward a judicial determination
• holding that a status hearing does not violate the automatic stay because it does not move the case forward to a judicial determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Mid-City Parking, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2005-10-31· cited 37×
• In Re Hoskins
  W.D. Missouri· 2001-09-26· cited 10×
• In Re Bona
  S.D. New York· 1990-02-23· cited 8×
• America Online, Inc. v. Uhrig (In Re Uhrig)
  M.D. Florida· 2004-02-26· cited 6×
• Cain v. Porter
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2010-03-29· cited 3×
• Thiel v. Thiel
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1989-11-22· cited 3×
• In re Welsch
  N.D. Illinois· 2019-07-30· cited 3×
• Lopez ex rel. Reyes v. Trujillo
  N.D. Texas· 2012-07-20· cited 2×
• AutoNation Fort Worth Motors, Ltd. D/B/A Bankston Chevrolet Fort Worth v. Linda M. Mitchell
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2025-10-09

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1988-02-24· cited 789×
• Gatx Aircraft Corporation v. M/v Courtney Leigh, and Bryan Dedeker, Mrs. Bryan Dedeker, Ray Loden, Mrs. Ray Loden and P.T. Bailey, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-08-19· cited 123×
• Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,481 Claude Freeman and Carol Freeman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-09-22· cited 39×