In Re Coastal Alaska Lines, Inc., Debtor. Zidell, Inc. v. Daniel E. Forsch, Esq., Trustee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that due process was satisfied where creditor “received information about the bankruptcy proceedings that was sufficient to put it on inquiry notice.”
• holding that an unscheduled creditor had constitutionally adequate notice of the bankruptcy pro- ceedings because it had sufficient information to evaluate whether to participate in the case and protect its interests
• charging a creditor with knowledge of the bar date where that creditor had actual knowledge of the bankruptcy proceedings, despite never having received actual notice of the bar date
• implied notice to creditor of deadline for filing nondischargeability complaints notwithstanding non-receipt of notice
• “[T]he bankruptcy court cannot enlarge the time for filing a proof of claim unless one of the six situations listed in Rule 3002(c) exists.”
• no equitable power exists to depart from the mandate of Rule 9006(b)(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).