In re C.N.
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 179
Syllabus
Nunc pro tunc. The state conceded that the journal entry did not reflect what the juvenile court decided at the sentencing hearing. When clerical mistakes are raised on appeal, Ohio appellate courts may remand the issue to the trial court and direct that the court correct the misstatement through a nunc pro tunc entry. The juvenile court is directed to issue a nunc pro tunc entry to correct the journal entry to reflect what was done at the sentencing hearing.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court· 2006-11-22· cited 371×
- State ex rel. Worcester v. DonnellonOhio Supreme Court· 1990-02-28· cited 119×
- In re J.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-21· cited 10×
- Jefferson Industries Corp. v. Madison Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-10-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.