Skip to main content
· 3/30/1992

In Re Club Associates, Debtor. First Union Real Estate Equity and Mortgage Investments v. Club Associates, a Georgia Limited Partnership

Citations

  • 956 F.2d 1065
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5498
  • 22 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1294
  • 1992 WL 46346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing appeal and endorsing the bankruptcy court's conclusion that the aggrieved party's failure to immediately seek a stay was \deliberate\
  • finding support for equitable mootness where third-parties had made investments that could not “be protected in the event of a reversal of the Confirmation Order”
  • “the absence of a stay does not compel a finding of mootness in all cases.”
  • \The concept of mootness is based upon the premise that a court will undertake the task of carefully examining each issue presented on appeal.\
  • lender's appeal of plan reorganizing real estate entity was moot where other parties had stepped in and made investments to revitalize the entity in reliance on the confirmed plan
  • appeal from bankruptcy court’s plan-confirmation order was equitably moot because “the reorganization plan ha[d] been so substantially consummated that effective relief [wa]s no longer available” (citation modified)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Dubina, Godbold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.