In Re Clinton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is axiomatic that in a case there can be only one order for relief....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brick Construction Corp. v. CEI Development Corp.
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 1999-05-26· cited 16×
• In re Basil Street Partners, LLC
  M.D. Florida· 2012-06-28· cited 10×
• Olson-Ioane v. Derham-Burk (In Re Olson)
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-08-29· cited 7×
• Vaughan v. Meridian National Corp. (In Re Ottawa River Steel Co.)
  N.D. Ohio· 2005-07-14· cited 3×
• In re Walker
  W.D. Tennessee· 1994-07-05· cited 2×
• In re Chilson
  D. New Mexico· 2015-02-04· cited 2×
• In Re Buerman
  W.D. Arkansas· 2003-07-23· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Austin
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1985-02-12· cited 16×
• In Re Masterson
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-12-12· cited 9×
• In Re Sobin
  M.D. Florida· 1989-05-05· cited 8×
• In Re Kirkus
  N.D. Georgia· 1987-08-13· cited 5×
• In Re Woodell
  E.D. Virginia· 1988-12-19· cited 5×