In re C.L.H.
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 2925
Syllabus
The juvenile court's decision granting legal custody of a child to the child's paternal cousin was in the child's best interest and otherwise not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the child had developed a strong bond with her cousin who had provided the child with a safe and stable home since the child was placed in her temporary custody.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting the district court “to consider authorities from 27 other jurisdictions” on remand (citation omitted)
- noting trustee, fiduciary, 3 guardian, or agent as “categories of relationships that courts have traditionally recognized as 4 establishing privity.”
- “California 11 incorporated Massachusetts’s employment classification statute into its labor laws” and “Dynamex 12 favorably cited two Massachusetts decisions . . .”
- courts have framed prong B inquiry in several ways, including whether work of employee is continuously per- formed for hiring entity and which business hiring entity proclaims to be in, all of which should be considered
- applying the ABC test in a three-tier 8 employment model
- instructing district court to apply 6 Dynamex on remand
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: S. Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.