In re Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an objection to claim “is a contested matter that exists independently of plan confirmation”
• “The filing of an objection to claim creates a contested matter governed by Bankruptcy Rule 9014. It is a contested matter that exists independently of plan confirmation.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In re Haskins
  W.D. Virginia· 2017-01-27· cited 5×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
• Brown v. Felsen
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,838×
• United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. Espinosa
  Supreme Court· 2010-03-23· cited 1,364×
• Nwosun v. General Mills Restaurants, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1997-09-08· cited 159×
• Andersen v. UNIPAC-NEBHELP (In Re Andersen)
  Tenth Circuit· 1999-06-07· cited 130×
• In Re John R. Kolstad, Debtor. United States of America (Internal Revenue Service) v. John R. Kolstad
  Fifth Circuit· 1991-04-10· cited 117×
• In Re Shank
  N.D. Georgia· 2004-10-07· cited 54×
• Morton v. Morton (In Re Morton)
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-09-12· cited 49×
• Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Bankruptcy Estate of Parmenter
  Sixth Circuit· 2008-05-30· cited 24×
• In Re Fareed
  N.D. Illinois· 2001-05-31· cited 19×
• Educational Credit Management Corp. v. Mersmann (In Re Mersmann)
  Tenth Circuit· 2007-09-24· cited 18×
• In Re Starling
  S.D. Florida· 2000-08-09· cited 18×
• Collins v. United States
  Fifth Circuit· 1933-05-31· cited 14×
• Hildebrand v. Hays Imports, Inc. (In Re Johnson)
  M.D. Tennessee· 2002-06-06· cited 13×
• In Re Barton
  E.D. Washington· 2000-06-15· cited 8×