In re Clark
Citations
- 86 Kan. 539
- 121 P. 492
- 1912 Kan. LEXIS 336
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Habeas Corpus — ■“Dangerous Insane” — Commitment—Ex Post Facto Law — Constitutional Law. Section 5 of chapter 299 of the Laws of 1911, providing that a person acquitted of a criminal charge on the ground that he was insane when the offense was committed, shall be committed to the asylum for the dangerous insane, and shall not be liberated therefrom except as prescribed in the act, is not ex post facto as to a person tried and acquitted on that ground after the statute was enacted for an offense committed before its passage.</p> <p>2. —:-- Same. The section referred to in the preceding paragraph is not obnoxious to the provision of the federal constitution that a state shall not deprive any person of due process of law, nor to the provisions of the state constitution that all persons for injuries to person, reputation or property shall have remedy by due course of law.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- case of Harry K. Thaw
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benson, Johnston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 478×
- In Re JonesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1980-06-14· cited 23×
- Department of Mental Hygiene v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-03-18· cited 18×
- Application of DowningIdaho Supreme Court· 1982-06-17· cited 16×
- Estate of GestnerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-03-18· cited 16×
- Lee v. KolbW.D. New York· 1978-05-01· cited 12×
- State v. BallouSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1984-07-31· cited 12×
- Hodison v. RogersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1933-06-10· cited 11×
- In re OstatterSupreme Court of Kansas· 1918-10-21· cited 9×
- In Re NoelSupreme Court of Kansas· 1979-10-27· cited 8×
- In re BeebeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-07-07· cited 7×
- Roark v. GravesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-04-18· cited 6×
- In re WadleighSupreme Court of Kansas· 1921-04-09· cited 6×
- State v. JacobUtah Supreme Court· 1983-08-26· cited 5×
- In re TimmSupreme Court of Kansas· 1929-11-09· cited 4×
- Sands v. Van DongeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1957-05-11· cited 3×
- State ex rel. Barnes v. BehanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1964-10-22· cited 3×
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1970-07-31· cited 2×
- Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1972-05-06· cited 1×
- People v. WhiteNew York Court of General Session of the Peace· 1931-06-30
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court· 1889-01-14· cited 764×
- Urquhart v. BrownSupreme Court· 1907-03-18· cited 136×
- Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration & ExaminationSupreme Court of Kansas· 1903-04-11· cited 106×
- In re FerrierIllinois Supreme Court· 1882-06-21· cited 57×
- DowdellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1897-11-05· cited 50×
- In re BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1905-07-14· cited 34×
- Wulf v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas· 1908-02-08· cited 34×
- Harrod v. Latham Mercantile & Commercial Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1908-03-07· cited 30×
- State ex rel. Thompson v. SnellWashington Supreme Court· 1907-04-27· cited 25×
- In Re BoyettSupreme Court of North Carolina· 1904-11-15· cited 24×
- State v. LinderholmSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-04-08· cited 17×
- WaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1894-03-07· cited 11×
- Gleason v. Inhabitants of West BoylstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1884-02-28· cited 9×
- Hardy v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1902-05-10· cited 7×
- Northfoss v. WelchSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1911-11-10· cited 7×
- Brown v. UrquhartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Washington· 1905-08-08· cited 7×
- State ex rel. Thompson v. SnellWashington Supreme Court· 1908-04-02· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.