in Re Clarence D. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• showing implicitly that a “serious medical need” equates to an “objective exposure to substantial risk of serious harm”
• showing implicitly that a “serious medical need” equates to an “objective exposure to substantial risk of serious harm”
• reversing district court's dismissal of pro se plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim where plaintiff alleged that he wanted the recommended dental treatment, not an alternative treatment
• assuming a Bivens remedy for a deliberate- indifference claim based on high-level prison officials failing to heed doctor’s orders
• assuming a Bivens remedy for a deliberate- indifference claim based on high-level prison officials failing to heed doctor’s orders
• reversing district court’s dismissal of pro se plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim where plaintiff alleged that he wanted the recommended dental treatment, not a preferred alternative treatment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).