In re Claim of Rappaport

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that attorney’s obstructionism in disciplinary proceeding “frustrated the diligent pursuit of serious charges against him, placed into question his fitness to represent others, and itself constituted conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice”
• finding that attorney’s 13 obstructionism in disciplinary proceeding “frustrated the diligent pursuit of 14 serious charges against him, placed into question his fitness to represent 15 others, and itself constituted conduct prejudicial to the administration of 16 justice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).