In re C.L.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 462
Syllabus
R.C. 2151.413 R.C. 2151.414 termination of parental rights child cannot be placed with either parent within a reasonable time or should not be placed with parents permanent custody in child's best interest. The juvenile court's judgment granting the agency permanent custody of the child was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. All of the court's findings under R.C. 2151.414(B)(1) were supported by clear and convincing evidence. Further, the court's best interest findings under R.C. 2151.414(D)(1) were supported by clear and convincing evidence.
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- Lansdowne v. Beacon Journal Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-09-02· cited 147×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re L.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 80×
- Love v. TupmanOhio Supreme Court· 1969-07-09· cited 67×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 61×
- In re J.F.Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-01-11· cited 48×
- In re K.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-11· cited 14×
- In re S.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-06· cited 11×
- In re S.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.