In Re Civil Commitment of WXC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the trial court correctly considered the experts' reliance on the appellant's mental health records, criminal history, clinical test results, and police reports
• first citing In re Civil Commitment of J.M.B., 395 N.J. Super. 69, 89 (App. Div. 2007), aff’d, 197 N.J. 563 (2009); then citing In re Civil Commitment of V.A., 357 N.J. Super. 55, 63 (App. Div. 2003)
• in a civil commitment proceeding, where the appellant refused to be interviewed by the testifying experts, the court reasoned that he could not \now argue that their testimony should not be considered because they did not evaluate him through interviews\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).