In Re Christus Spohn Hospital Kleberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the hospital could not use Rule 193.3(d) because the work-product privilege did not apply to the report at issue
• explaining that jurors need access to data underlying expert’s testimony “to accurately assess the testimony’s worth”
• stating that expert must provide factfinder facts and data underlying expert’s testimony for factfinder “to accurately assess the testimony’s worth”
• explaining that experts may rely on inadmissible hearsay and other information that ordinary witness may not
• explaining that jurors need access to data underlying expert’s testimony “to accurately assess the testimony’s worth”
• detailing reasons why it is essential that the jury have access to the facts and data underlying an expert’s testimony in order “to accurately assess the testimony’s worth.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).