In Re Christopher L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• assuming evidence existed that respondent would have benefited from additional services addressing respon- dent’s trauma issues, such evidence would not under- mine court’s reasonable efforts determination
• assuming evidence existed that respondent would have benefited from additional services addressing respon- dent’s trauma issues, such evidence would not under- mine court’s reasonable efforts determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Jason B.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-07-26· cited 5×
• In re Kamal R.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-03· cited 2×
• In re Joseph M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-08-04
• In re Corey C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2020-06-08
• In re Ryder M
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2022-04-20

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility Control
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-09-30· cited 92×
• In Re Melody L.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-01-20· cited 78×
• In re Daniel C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-05-15· cited 74×
• In re Vincent B.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-11-19· cited 31×
• Histen v. Histen
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-12-19· cited 21×
• In Re Anna Lee M.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-10-02· cited 20×
• In re Alexander T.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2004-02-24· cited 18×
• Lemme v. Langlois
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1968-07-19· cited 15×
• In re Devon W.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-10-26· cited 11×
• In Re Jordan T.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-03-09· cited 7×