In Re Christopher C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• despite department’s repeated offers of referrals and assistance so respondent could satisfy specific steps requirements respondent refused to comply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Kyara H.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-01-28· cited 19×
• In Re Christopher C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-03-16· cited 7×
• In re Navaeh W.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-12-09

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Antony B.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1999-08-17· cited 85×
• In re G.S.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-10-27· cited 17×
• In Re Tremaine C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-10-13· cited 16×
• In Re GS
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-10-27· cited 16×
• In Re Sole S.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2010-02-02· cited 15×
• In Re Christopher C.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2012-03-16· cited 7×
• In re Krystal J.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-04-05· cited 4×