In re Children of Brittany B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Hager and finding that because the plaintiffs “failed to allege -- beyond legal conclusions couched as factual statements -- that they were treated less favorably because of their race,” the district court properly dismissed their Title VI claim
• “[I]t goes almost without saying that a sexual assault complainant and those she accuses of sexual assault are not similarly situated as complainants.”
• “[I]t goes almost without saying that a sexual assault complainant and those she accuses of sexual assault are not similarly situated as complainants.”
• analyzing equal-protection and Title VI claims together under same standard
• “blind eye” is a legal conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).