Skip to main content
· 1/27/2010

In Re: CHEVRON U.S.A., INC., Relator

Citations

  • 419 S.W.3d 341
  • 2010 WL 308305
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • consolidating an interlocutory appeal and mandamus action but still concluding that dismissal of the interlocutory appeal for want of jurisdiction was required where there was no basis for appellate jurisdiction
  • “Because [the party] filed its motion to vacate . . . after the expiration of the limitations period, the trial court had a ministerial duty to deny the motion to vacate and grant the motion to confirm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chew, McClure, Ables

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.