In Re Chevron Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an attorney’s communications were not privileged when “substantial evidence” suggested his predominant role was “not the rendition of professional legal services, but politics, lobbying, and media and public relations”
• “[T]he proposed discovery focuses on matters concerning which Donziger is a percipient witness and a principal actor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).