Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
· 12/12/1989

In Re Chester W. Newell

Citations

  • 891 F.2d 899
  • 13 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1248
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 18758
  • 1989 WL 149651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A retrospective view of inherency is not a substitute for some teaching or suggestion which supports the selection and use of the various' elements in the particular claimed combination.”
  • “[A] retrospective view of in-herency is not a substitute for some teaching or suggestion which supports the selection and use of the various elements in the particular claimed combination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Markey, Baldwin, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.