Skip to main content
· 12/3/1901

In re Chequasset Lumber Co.

Citations

  • 112 F. 56
  • 1901 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • estoppel defense failed because it did not “give the plaintiffs fair notice of what the claim is and the grounds upon which it rests”
  • “An attack on a plaintiff’s prima facie claim is a ‘negative defense,’ rather than an affirmative defense, which must plead ‘matter that is not within the claimant’s prima facie case.’” (citation omitted)
  • “[A] negative defense is an attack on a plaintiff’s prima facie case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.