In re Chemo Puro Manufacturing Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing counsel’s duty to cooperate in “designing search terms” and engage in testing of keywork searches
• complaining about lawyers “designing keyword searches in the dark, by the seat of the pants, without adequate (indeed, here, apparently without any) discussion with those who wrote the emails”
• “Electronic discovery requires cooperation between opposing counsel and transparency in all aspects of preservation and production of ESI.”
• “Electronic discovery requires cooperation between opposing counsel and transparency in all aspects of preservation and production of ESI.”
• the law “requires cooperation between opposing counsel” on ESI discovery
• “This Opinion should serve as a wake-up call . . . about the need for careful thought, quality control, testing, and cooperation with opposing counsel in designing search terms or ‘keywords’ to be used to produce emails or other electronically stored information.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).