In Re Chemical Dynamics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether “a single unified design” that constitutes a “unitary mark” can be “mutilate[ed]’
• 5 years’ use of composite mark does not speak to the issue of whether a component is viewed by itself as a mark
• design of medicine dropper and droplet does not create separate commercial impression from the wording and watering can
• 5 years’ use of composite mark does not speak to the issue of whether a component is viewed by itself as a mark
• design of medicine dropper and droplet does not create separate commercial impression from the wording and watering can
• the three elements of the background–the dropper, the droplet, and the watering can–are interrelated elements of a single unified design and cannot be registered separately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).