Skip to main content

In Re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation

Citations

  • 626 F. Supp. 2d 1333
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82137
  • 2009 WL 1658847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that two defendant banks initially opposed centralization, but changed their minds at the JPML’s hearing session
  • noting that two defendant banks initially opposed centralization, but changed their minds at the JPML’s hearing session
  • centralizing overdraft fee cases before this Court to “promote the just and efficient conduct of the litigation,” and entrusting the Court “to efficiently manage this litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frederick, Heyburn II, John, Miller, Motz, Robert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.