In Re Charter First Mortgage, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was “totally appropriate for Washington to proceed in the state court to attempt to obtain an injunction, civil penalties, and attorney fees and costs against debtor for alleged violation of its Consumer Protection Act”
• court must distinguish between those proceedings which fulfill a public policy and those which adjudicate private rights
• “[I]t is totally appropriate for Washington to proceed in the state court to attempt to obtain an injunction, civil penalties and attorney fees and costs against debtor .... ”
• debtor’s argument that injunctive relief is moot because debtor ceased operations should be addressed to the state court, not the bankruptcy court
• “totally appropriate” for the state to proceed in state court to attempt to obtain an injunction under Oregon’s version of the UPA
• “totally appropriate” for the state to proceed in state court to attempt to obtain an injunction under Oregon’s version of the UPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).