In Re Charles Jason R., Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding of sexual abuse by father; rejecting parents’ claim “that their due process rights were violated by the court’s reliance solely on the out-of-court statements made by their son when he was less than four years of age”
• finding of sexual abuse by father; rejecting parents' claim \that their due process rights were violated by the court's reliance solely on the out-of-court statements made by their son when he was less than four years of age\
• “Once admitted and relied upon by the court, [the child’s out-of-court] statement amply supported the court’s finding [of abuse] by a preponderance....”
• “Once admitted and relied upon by the court, [the child’s out-of-court] statement amply supported the court’s finding [of abuse] by a preponderance . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).