In Re Charles C. Gardenhire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an IRS claim filed 11 days after the deadline could not be allowed under a theory of equitable tolling where the case had been dismissed and then reinstated with 14 days left on the 180-day deadline for government entities
• \Close adherence to the text of the relevant statutory provisions and rules is especially appropriatein a highly statutory area such as bankruptcy.\
• “[I]n a Chapter 13 proceeding: ‘Where the statutory language is clear, our “sole function ... is to enforce it according to its terms.”’”
• \[T]his language means just what it says. A 180-day period is a 180-day period.\
• “Our precedents support the 17 conclusion that a bankruptcy court lacks equitable discretion to 18 enlarge the time to file proofs of claim; rather, it may only 19 20 4 Rule 3004 states: 21 If a creditor does not timely file a proof of claim 22 under Rule 3002(c) or 3003(c
• “Our precedents support the 17 conclusion that a bankruptcy court lacks equitable discretion to 18 enlarge the time to file proofs of claim; rather, it may only 19 20 4 Rule 3004 states: 21 If a creditor does not timely file a proof of claim 22 under Rule 3002(c) or 3003(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).