In re Chapman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that exhaustion would not be required if delay would destroy ability to obtain relief
• letter to agency sufficient for agency to consider its position and for court to reach the merits
• bar must carefully tailor its position on legislative activities to limited issues within its constitutional mandate in order to protect its members’ individual rights
• when exercising “its inherent constitutional power to regulate the practice of law,” court has “greater freedom” in policymaking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Konefal v. Hollis/Brookline Cooperative School District
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-12-29· cited 49×
• Keller v. State Bar
  California Supreme Court· 1989-02-23· cited 31×
• M-Plan, Inc. v. Indiana Comprehensive Health Insurance Ass'n
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2004-06-08· cited 26×
• In re Mone
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-11-04· cited 15×
• In re New Hampshire Bar Ass'n
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2004-06-14· cited 7×
• In re Tocci
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-04-23· cited 6×
• Nashua Teachers Union v. Nashua School District
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-03-23· cited 6×
• DeVere v. State
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-07-08· cited 6×
• In re Proposed Public Protection Fund Rule
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-01-22· cited 5×
• Florida Bar re: Schwarz
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-06-02· cited 2×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 1,173×
• International Ass'n of MacHinists v. Street
  Supreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 710×
• Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-25· cited 678×
• Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. Hudson
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-04· cited 498×
• Railway Employes' Department v. Hanson
  Supreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 399×
• Lathrop v. Donohue
  Supreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 229×
• Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto Rico
  D. Puerto Rico· 1982-09-13· cited 38×
• In Re Unification of the New Hampshire Bar
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1968-12-31· cited 34×
• O'NEIL v. Thomson
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1974-02-28· cited 27×
• Arrow v. Dow
  D. New Mexico· 1982-08-16· cited 19×
• Tirrell v. Johnston
  Supreme Court· 1934-12-17· cited 13×
• In re Unified New Hampshire Bar
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1972-06-08· cited 11×