In re C.G.V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the defendant bears the burden of proving that it fits within the FHA's \religious organization\ exemption, § 3607(a)
• stating that the “religious organization” and “private club” exemptions in § 3607(a) are affirmative defenses
• noting that the defendant bears the burden of proving that it fits within the FHA’s “religious organization” exemption, § 3607(a)
• explaining that “[u]nder general principles of statutory construction, one who claims the benefit of an exception from the prohibition of a statute has the burden of proving that his claim comes within the exception” (internal quotation omitted)
• defendant has burden to show it is a private or religious club excepted from Title VIII fair housing laws
• the “religious organization” 4 and “private club” exemptions qualified as affirmative defenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).