· 3/2/1976
Federal Case
Citations
- 532 F.2d 64
- 21 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1061
- 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 12614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that □ “[a]ppellants could assert the cross-claim only in their answer.’’
- “A cross-claim must be stated in a pleading. At the same time, it is not itself a pleading.”
- questions of exceptional importance to the parties may suffice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.