Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he presumption of public access may be rebutted”
• noting that “[t]he presumption of public access may be rebutted”
• noting that “[t]he presumption of public access may be rebutted”
• noting that “[t]he presumption of public access may be rebutted”
• recognizing “presumption of public access” to court filings
• “Broad allegations of harm, bereft of specific examples or articulated reasoning, are insufficient.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).