In re C.D.A.-C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a juvenile offender could not appeal the new sentence imposed at a probation violation hearing because it was within the presumptive range set forth in the placement matrix
• finding K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 38-2380 [b][2][A] precluded review of juvenile offender's probation revocation and new sentence, which 3 was within presumptive range
• this court does not have jurisdiction to review a district court's decision to revoke a juvenile offender's probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).