In re C.C., H.R.-1, and R.K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that persecution motivated by a personal vendetta is not “on account of” a protected ground
• holding that purely personal retribution is not persecution on account of a protected ground
• holding that personal retribution alone does not satisfy the nexus requirement
• holding that personal disputes do not satisfy the nexus requirement
• noting that “[p]urely personal retribution” is not persecution “on account of” a protected ground (citation omitted)
• finding that “[p]urely personal retribution” is “not persecution on account of” a protected ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).