In re C.B.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1578
Syllabus
Permanent custody termination of parental rights due process motion for continuance Juv.R. 23 Juv.Loc.R. 35(C) abuse of discretion. Under the particular facts and circumstances of the case, juvenile court abused its discretion in denying mother's motion for continuance of permanent custody hearing without conducting even a minimal inquiry to determine the facts necessary to evaluate relevant factors prior to ruling on mother's motion for continuance.
Judges: E.A. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court· 1964-05-04· cited 1,845×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- State v. UngerOhio Supreme Court· 1981-07-01· cited 1,145×
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- State v. BroomOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 575×
- In re HoffmanOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-23· cited 194×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re J.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-26· cited 82×
- In re L.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 80×
- State v. SowdersOhio Supreme Court· 1983-04-13· cited 63×
- In re J.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-29· cited 47×
- In re A.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-18· cited 12×
- In re K.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-28· cited 7×
- In re C.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.