In re Castrinakis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that interrogatories may ask for the material or principal facts that support a party’s contention
• stating that “[c]ourts have considerable discretion in determining when contention interrogatories must be answered” and then examining whether the plaintiff had to answer the defendants’ interrogatories individually
• noting that “all objections to discovery requests must be timely or they are waived”
• “Simply referring a party to a mass of records . . . is not a sufficient response [to a discovery request.]”
• “[T]here is considerable support for deferring answers to contention interrogatories until after a substantial amount of discovery has been completed.”
• “While some courts have criticized the use of contention interrogatories, no court has categorically prohibited their use in all cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).