In re Casey
Citations
- 195 F. 322
- 1912 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1644
Syllabus
<p>1. Bankruptcy (§ 410*)—Discharge—Application—Delay in Making—Ex cuse.</p> <p>A bankrupt may be said to bave been unavoidably prevented irom ap plying for a discharge within twelve months after the adjudication, so as to entitle him to apply within 18 months under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 14, 30 Stat. 550 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3427), if he or his family were sick, and he did not have sufficient means to pay an attorney for preparing his application for discharge.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. § 694; Dec. Dig. § 410.*]</p> <p>2. Bankruptcy (§ 410*)—Discharge—Application—Filing—Extension op Time—Objection—Waiver.</p> <p>A creditor waived objection to an order extending the time for filing bankrupt’s application for discharge by appearing and obtaining time to file specifications of objection to the discharge, and by filing objections.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—For other eases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. § 694; Dec. Dig. § 410.*]</p> <p>. 3. Bankruptcy (§ 410*)—Discharge—Jurisbiction.</p> <p>Under Bankr. Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, § 14, 30 Stat. 550 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3427), authorizing application for a discharge after one year, but within 18 months after the adjudication, where bankrupt was unavoidably prevented from applying within one year, a federal District Court, sitting in a bankruptcy case, had jurisdiction to entertain an application for an extension of time in which bankrupt might apply for a final discharge, though the evidence was, insufficient to establish the fact that bankrupt was unavoidably prevented from applying for a discharge within the year.</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—For other, cases, see Bankruptcy, Cent. Dig. § 694; Dec. Dig. § 410.*</p> <p>Jurisdiction of federal courts in suits relating to bankruptcy, see note to Bailey v. Mosher, 11 C. C. A. 313.]</p> <p>4. Bankruptcy (§ 415*)—Discharge—Application—Filing—Extension op Time—Re vie w.</p> <p>An order extending the time for filing application for discharge
Judges: Ray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Merrill v. Rocky Mountain Cattle Co.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1918-06-23· cited 16×
- In re MacLauchlanSecond Circuit· 1925-11-09· cited 12×
- Schodde v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1934-03-12· cited 10×
- In re GoldsteinE.D. New York· 1930-04-24· cited 7×
- In re BalzerS.D. California· 1926-03-30· cited 5×
- In re La RosaSecond Circuit· 1926-11-01· cited 4×
- In re MaltaW.D. New York· 1932-05-10· cited 3×
- Burbank Lumber Co. v. ChurchNinth Circuit· 1934-03-19· cited 2×
- In re PowersD. Massachusetts· 1941-12-18· cited 2×
- In re DonleyM.D. Pennsylvania· 1936-12-17
- In re MaierD. Maine· 1919-03-04
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Noble v. Union River Logging RailroadSupreme Court· 1893-01-09· cited 287×
- Iowa v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1893-01-03· cited 85×
- New Lamp Chimney Co. v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.Supreme Court· 1876-01-10· cited 79×
- Comstock v. CrawfordSupreme Court· 1866-01-18· cited 63×
- Simms v. SlacumSupreme Court· 1806-02-19· cited 51×
- Whitney v. FoxSupreme Court· 1897-04-19· cited 45×
- Beebe v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1896-03-02· cited 8×
- Bacon v. RobertsThird Circuit· 1906-09-10· cited 8×
- In re NicholsN.D. New York· 1909-01-18· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.