In re Casey
Citations
- 27 Wash. 686
- 68 P. 185
- 1902 Wash. LEXIS 441
Syllabus
<p>HABEAS CORPUS-COMMITMENT UNDER ERRONEOUS JUDGMENT-REMEDY BY APPEAL.</p> <p>The action, of a justice of the peace in fining the accused, upon the failure of the jury to fix his punishment, when, under Bal. Code, § 6669, the jury was charged with the duty of assessing the punishment for any prisoner whom they might find guilty, although erroneous, was not void, where the justice had jurisdiction of the .person and the subject-matter; and habeas' corpus will not lie to secure the prisoner’s release from commitment under such erroneous judgment, but the proper remedy is by ap■peal.</p>
Judges: Hadley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re the Personal Restraint of GoodwinWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 363×
- Ex Parte TannerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1929-01-28· cited 34×
- In Re GoodwinWashington Supreme Court· 2002-07-25· cited 33×
- In re MileckeWashington Supreme Court· 1909-03-27· cited 20×
- Northwestern Improvement Co. v. McNeilWashington Supreme Court· 1918-01-31· cited 17×
- In re VoightWashington Supreme Court· 1924-06-04· cited 17×
- Christensen v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1949-03-05· cited 14×
- State ex rel. Zenner v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court· 1904-01-11· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Elms v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-06-17· cited 9×
- People Ex Rel. Wakefield v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court· 1937-02-18· cited 6×
- State v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court· 1921-07-22· cited 3×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.